<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting in</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/09/05/getting-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/09/05/getting-in/</link>
	<description>Former Photography Director Rob Haggart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:36:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/09/05/getting-in/comment-page-1/#comment-1472</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/09/05/getting-in/#comment-1472</guid>
		<description>I still refuse to introduce myself to the softer side of a bullwhip to get myself noticed...or is that artistic &quot;roadblock&quot; going to change for me as well?


(strumming fingers on table, rhythmically)


accountants are pretty happy, aren&#039;t they?

sorry...just thinking to myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still refuse to introduce myself to the softer side of a bullwhip to get myself noticed&#8230;or is that artistic &#8220;roadblock&#8221; going to change for me as well?</p>
<p>(strumming fingers on table, rhythmically)</p>
<p>accountants are pretty happy, aren&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>sorry&#8230;just thinking to myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/09/05/getting-in/comment-page-1/#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/09/05/getting-in/#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>Well thats a cheery thought...knowing that after school, I&#039;m going to have to live on Top Ramen noodles, ketchup packets stolen from fast food places and Tic Tacs for the better part of my photographic life.

Maybe I&#039;ll get a side job at Burger King...so I can stay in some meat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well thats a cheery thought&#8230;knowing that after school, I&#8217;m going to have to live on Top Ramen noodles, ketchup packets stolen from fast food places and Tic Tacs for the better part of my photographic life.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;ll get a side job at Burger King&#8230;so I can stay in some meat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paracetamol</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/09/05/getting-in/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>paracetamol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/09/05/getting-in/#comment-721</guid>
		<description>@Johnnie B -- as a photo editor at a major magazine I just want to say that we have been fighting to raise rates for years. It&#039;s not that we don&#039;t care, it&#039;s just that upper managment won&#039;t give us the go ahead.

The good news is that it looks like we might be moving towards giving higher rates to those photographers that we have worked with for a very long time (10 years or so).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Johnnie B &#8212; as a photo editor at a major magazine I just want to say that we have been fighting to raise rates for years. It&#8217;s not that we don&#8217;t care, it&#8217;s just that upper managment won&#8217;t give us the go ahead.</p>
<p>The good news is that it looks like we might be moving towards giving higher rates to those photographers that we have worked with for a very long time (10 years or so).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Brinson</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/09/05/getting-in/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 21:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/09/05/getting-in/#comment-316</guid>
		<description>throw a dog a bone :) That&#039;s were great relationships start.
http://www.williambrinson.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>throw a dog a bone :) That&#8217;s were great relationships start.<br />
<a href="http://www.williambrinson.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.williambrinson.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnnie B</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/09/05/getting-in/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnnie B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/09/05/getting-in/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Why is this?  I could understand the reluctance to use someone new if you worked at an agency and there was real money on the table.  What are you risking with editorial? A paltry $350 - $500 assignment fee (unless you&#039;re at Business Week or Forbes where they pay a decent rate)?  Which begs the question - why are rates so low? Rates today are the same as when I started in 1992.  Why?  Do photo editors realize this?  Do they care?  What can be done to raise the rates?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this?  I could understand the reluctance to use someone new if you worked at an agency and there was real money on the table.  What are you risking with editorial? A paltry $350 &#8211; $500 assignment fee (unless you&#8217;re at Business Week or Forbes where they pay a decent rate)?  Which begs the question &#8211; why are rates so low? Rates today are the same as when I started in 1992.  Why?  Do photo editors realize this?  Do they care?  What can be done to raise the rates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
