<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Death of $1 Stock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/</link>
	<description>Former Photography Director Rob Haggart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:14:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 链接串串烧，2010年11月28日 &#124; 闪卓博识 - 官方网站</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-70818</link>
		<dc:creator>链接串串烧，2010年11月28日 &#124; 闪卓博识 - 官方网站</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 08:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-70818</guid>
		<description>[...] 闪卓博识-官方网站（http://www.shanzhuoboshi.com）     &#160;          2010年 11月 28日评论（0） 链接串串烧，2010年11月28日  　  本站文章版权属闪卓博识网站　浏览前请仔细阅读《版权声明》  • Wizwow推荐的这个宝贝：一个知无不言的博客，由一位全国性杂志的摄影编辑匿名撰写。他（或她）最近关于$1美元微利图片库的抱怨？它太昂贵了。 • 向你推荐的十个拍摄用光小技巧，讲解简明扼要，并附图片说明每种技巧的运用。 • 不知道我们之中有多少人钟情于“延时摄影”，但日本摄影师Mockmoon在这方面做得很棒！这个分为三部分的大自然延时摄影作品（Nature Time Lapse），曾获得了Youtube日本分舵自然摄影部门年度金奖。 • 看看闪卓士 Techie1977 如何用闪卓博识介绍过的方法把玩偶拍的出神入化。  本闪卓博识文章受版权法保护　请珍惜本站劳动成果                    文章信息   作者：大卫·豪比   翻译：张庆敏&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;编辑：王耀栋   原文链接：Speedlinks, 10/6/2007     文章导航  上一篇：“投稿活动”后续       &#160;     评论请在这里留下您的意见 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 闪卓博识-官方网站（http://www.shanzhuoboshi.com）     &nbsp;          2010年 11月 28日评论（0） 链接串串烧，2010年11月28日  　  本站文章版权属闪卓博识网站　浏览前请仔细阅读《版权声明》  • Wizwow推荐的这个宝贝：一个知无不言的博客，由一位全国性杂志的摄影编辑匿名撰写。他（或她）最近关于$1美元微利图片库的抱怨？它太昂贵了。 • 向你推荐的十个拍摄用光小技巧，讲解简明扼要，并附图片说明每种技巧的运用。 • 不知道我们之中有多少人钟情于“延时摄影”，但日本摄影师Mockmoon在这方面做得很棒！这个分为三部分的大自然延时摄影作品（Nature Time Lapse），曾获得了Youtube日本分舵自然摄影部门年度金奖。 • 看看闪卓士 Techie1977 如何用闪卓博识介绍过的方法把玩偶拍的出神入化。  本闪卓博识文章受版权法保护　请珍惜本站劳动成果                    文章信息   作者：大卫·豪比   翻译：张庆敏&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;编辑：王耀栋   原文链接：Speedlinks, 10/6/2007     文章导航  上一篇：“投稿活动”后续       &nbsp;     评论请在这里留下您的意见 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedlinks, 10/6/2007 &#124; Speedlinks, 10/6/2007 flash &#124; Speedlinks, 10/6/2007 &#62; &#124; Flash photography &#124; Photography Anime &#124; Nikon Canon</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-68454</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedlinks, 10/6/2007 &#124; Speedlinks, 10/6/2007 flash &#124; Speedlinks, 10/6/2007 &#62; &#124; Flash photography &#124; Photography Anime &#124; Nikon Canon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-68454</guid>
		<description>[...] • Thanks also to Wizwow for this little gem: A tell all blog anonymously written by a national magazine photo editor. His (or her &#8211; thanks commenter) latest complaint about the $1 microstock? It&#8217;s too expensive. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] • Thanks also to Wizwow for this little gem: A tell all blog anonymously written by a national magazine photo editor. His (or her &#8211; thanks commenter) latest complaint about the $1 microstock? It&#8217;s too expensive. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedlinks, 10/6/2007 &#124; Speedlinks, 10/6/2007 Flash &#124; Speedlinks, 10/6/2007 &#62; &#124; Flash photography &#62; off-camera flash &#62; Nikon Canon</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-67676</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedlinks, 10/6/2007 &#124; Speedlinks, 10/6/2007 Flash &#124; Speedlinks, 10/6/2007 &#62; &#124; Flash photography &#62; off-camera flash &#62; Nikon Canon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 05:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-67676</guid>
		<description>[...] • Thanks also to Wizwow for this little gem: A tell all blog anonymously written by a national magazine photo editor. His (or her &#8211; thanks commenter) latest complaint about the $1 microstock? It&#8217;s too expensive. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] • Thanks also to Wizwow for this little gem: A tell all blog anonymously written by a national magazine photo editor. His (or her &#8211; thanks commenter) latest complaint about the $1 microstock? It&#8217;s too expensive. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-41964</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-41964</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the number one free site boasts of having 125,000 pictures. Picking one at random I find it is out of focus, uncomposed and despite being &quot;100% legal&quot; it shows a minor and has no model release:

http://www.freefoto.com/preview/1009-22-5?ffid=1009-22-5

Boy, doesn&#039;t this stuff just scare the pants off me as a full-time microstocker! I sure wish I could get my standards up there with this photographer&#039;s!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the number one free site boasts of having 125,000 pictures. Picking one at random I find it is out of focus, uncomposed and despite being &#8220;100% legal&#8221; it shows a minor and has no model release:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.freefoto.com/preview/1009-22-5?ffid=1009-22-5" rel="nofollow">http://www.freefoto.com/preview/1009-22-5?ffid=1009-22-5</a></p>
<p>Boy, doesn&#8217;t this stuff just scare the pants off me as a full-time microstocker! I sure wish I could get my standards up there with this photographer&#8217;s!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asdf</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-3746</link>
		<dc:creator>asdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-3746</guid>
		<description>Dude, interesting. However, the link to the free stock photos is dead.. Sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, interesting. However, the link to the free stock photos is dead.. Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-425</guid>
		<description>The death of microstock? I doubt it. But you keep hoping. Though, I do agree that there is a lot of crap photography out there. But many microstock companies are starting to delete those images. I think it will all work out in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The death of microstock? I doubt it. But you keep hoping. Though, I do agree that there is a lot of crap photography out there. But many microstock companies are starting to delete those images. I think it will all work out in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bert</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 02:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-342</guid>
		<description>A quote from the old days:
If you buy a violin, you have a violin.
If you buy a camera, you are a photographer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quote from the old days:<br />
If you buy a violin, you have a violin.<br />
If you buy a camera, you are a photographer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xlt</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>xlt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-319</guid>
		<description>I do agree. Well, i&#039;m neither professional designer nor professional photographer. I&#039;m amateur. And both - design and photo is my hobby. So i invest in those things as in my free time activities not business. An i don t need 36 Mpix camera - for me its enaugh with 8.

i use free stcock photos when i need some (and don&#039;t have my own). though, sometimes it is so hard to find a picture which fits your needs. can you complain about things that come as cheap as for free?

Professionals shall be substantially better if they want make out living of it. and it&#039;s not just about photography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do agree. Well, i&#8217;m neither professional designer nor professional photographer. I&#8217;m amateur. And both &#8211; design and photo is my hobby. So i invest in those things as in my free time activities not business. An i don t need 36 Mpix camera &#8211; for me its enaugh with 8.</p>
<p>i use free stcock photos when i need some (and don&#8217;t have my own). though, sometimes it is so hard to find a picture which fits your needs. can you complain about things that come as cheap as for free?</p>
<p>Professionals shall be substantially better if they want make out living of it. and it&#8217;s not just about photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince in Malta</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince in Malta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 21:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Free photographs should be part of a larger picture.  I am all in favour  .......  of free websites, magazines, books etc.

Free photos means no payment to the photographer and so should life be.  Journalists should provide copy for free and picture editors should do their jobs for free ...  Picture libraries should make no money ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free photographs should be part of a larger picture.  I am all in favour  &#8230;&#8230;.  of free websites, magazines, books etc.</p>
<p>Free photos means no payment to the photographer and so should life be.  Journalists should provide copy for free and picture editors should do their jobs for free &#8230;  Picture libraries should make no money &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdtnc</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>pdtnc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 17:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Free stuff is always good, there is a place for utterly free stock...
There are loads of people out there tinkering with Photoshop and other image editing apps, creating artworks, manipulating images, for fun and for learning.
If a company or designer is buying an image its a different matter, a company might want to portray an individual image (company&#039;s image) and not have the mass-market highly-used images you find on the free sites and $1.

Check my blog for a link to some free credits at istock :)

also a few earnings stats :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free stuff is always good, there is a place for utterly free stock&#8230;<br />
There are loads of people out there tinkering with Photoshop and other image editing apps, creating artworks, manipulating images, for fun and for learning.<br />
If a company or designer is buying an image its a different matter, a company might want to portray an individual image (company&#8217;s image) and not have the mass-market highly-used images you find on the free sites and $1.</p>
<p>Check my blog for a link to some free credits at istock :)</p>
<p>also a few earnings stats :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Critue</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Critue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Who is this  &quot; A Photo Editor National Magazine Photo Editor &quot; , a representative for Alamy ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is this  &#8221; A Photo Editor National Magazine Photo Editor &#8221; , a representative for Alamy ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramon Garcia</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramon Garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-252</guid>
		<description>This trend is just going to drive the industry down like it&#039;s done with so many others.  Things will come to a very low point but when it does pick up later on, the true value and quality standards for photos is going to emerge.  Look forward for a tough time ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This trend is just going to drive the industry down like it&#8217;s done with so many others.  Things will come to a very low point but when it does pick up later on, the true value and quality standards for photos is going to emerge.  Look forward for a tough time ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Singer</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-250</guid>
		<description>12 Megapixles.  You&#039;re clearly a hack!  I shoot with 39 Megapixles.  I.e., I am better than you.

;-)

Peter, I agree.  I hate the &quot;I would love to pay you more but my hands are tied&quot; line.  Getting quality images out is going to take more than the photographers doing all the standing up.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>12 Megapixles.  You&#8217;re clearly a hack!  I shoot with 39 Megapixles.  I.e., I am better than you.</p>
<p>;-)</p>
<p>Peter, I agree.  I hate the &#8220;I would love to pay you more but my hands are tied&#8221; line.  Getting quality images out is going to take more than the photographers doing all the standing up.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-246</guid>
		<description>I believe art directors and buyers are occasionally frustrated with their clients who put pressure on the agencies to keep slashing the photo budget. Just as photographers need to stand up for thier fees, some agencies also need to step-up-to-the-plate and insist on larger budgets for photography - everyone wins with  high quality commissioned work.... the photographers are obviously happy (because they not only earn more, but flex their creative muscles) the agencies increase their creative integrity, and the client generates greater sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe art directors and buyers are occasionally frustrated with their clients who put pressure on the agencies to keep slashing the photo budget. Just as photographers need to stand up for thier fees, some agencies also need to step-up-to-the-plate and insist on larger budgets for photography &#8211; everyone wins with  high quality commissioned work&#8230;. the photographers are obviously happy (because they not only earn more, but flex their creative muscles) the agencies increase their creative integrity, and the client generates greater sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Well said...It is intresting how many new shooters there are with the &quot;invention&quot; of digital.  The equiptment is more expensinve and your actual cost business is higher then shooting film but it seems now that everyone everyone thinks they are a photographer because the have a 12megapizel camera.  I think we are just in a transiton period and a lot of these &quot;photographers&quot; will realize that making five dollors a year can&#039;t pay the bills.
Most photo editors that I have talked to are frustrated and board with stock photography.  I agree with PE that new and fresh ways of looking at the same old thing will definitely win over a buyer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said&#8230;It is intresting how many new shooters there are with the &#8220;invention&#8221; of digital.  The equiptment is more expensinve and your actual cost business is higher then shooting film but it seems now that everyone everyone thinks they are a photographer because the have a 12megapizel camera.  I think we are just in a transiton period and a lot of these &#8220;photographers&#8221; will realize that making five dollors a year can&#8217;t pay the bills.<br />
Most photo editors that I have talked to are frustrated and board with stock photography.  I agree with PE that new and fresh ways of looking at the same old thing will definitely win over a buyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Im a Micro stock shooter, If you use my photo, I will GIVE you $5.00

(starting my own trend)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im a Micro stock shooter, If you use my photo, I will GIVE you $5.00</p>
<p>(starting my own trend)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Boyes</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Boyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 07:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>This bland commercialisation of stock in a race for the bottom (can you get much lower than free??) is only going to lead back to high-end buyers commissioning more original unique material again.  

....and that&#039;s a good thing for photographers! 

J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bland commercialisation of stock in a race for the bottom (can you get much lower than free??) is only going to lead back to high-end buyers commissioning more original unique material again.  </p>
<p>&#8230;.and that&#8217;s a good thing for photographers! </p>
<p>J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Giannatti</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Giannatti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 04:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-220</guid>
		<description>Man, you pissed off a lot of recent D-SLR shooters who were promised a shot at fame if they increased to 12 megapixels. 

So let me get this right... It&#039;s about talent?

Yeah. Always has been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, you pissed off a lot of recent D-SLR shooters who were promised a shot at fame if they increased to 12 megapixels. </p>
<p>So let me get this right&#8230; It&#8217;s about talent?</p>
<p>Yeah. Always has been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Kate , welcome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate , welcome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I am new to this thing!    Welcome me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am new to this thing!    Welcome me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GadgetGadget.info - Gadgets on the web &#187; The Death of $1 Stock</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>GadgetGadget.info - Gadgets on the web &#187; The Death of $1 Stock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 01:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-206</guid>
		<description>[...] Amber McNaught wrote an interesting post today!.Here&#8217;s a quick excerptI’ve bought $1 stock before but the only reason I did it is I couldn’t find a similar photo at the other stock sources and I was told we absolutely had to have a photo to illustrate this very important part of the story. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Amber McNaught wrote an interesting post today!.Here&#8217;s a quick excerptI’ve bought $1 stock before but the only reason I did it is I couldn’t find a similar photo at the other stock sources and I was told we absolutely had to have a photo to illustrate this very important part of the story. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marko</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Now that cliche imagery is literally being devalued, does this mean everybody with a budget will crave anti-cliche imagery? (As opposed to what essentially amounts to cliche stock imagery shot custom?)

I do hope so.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that cliche imagery is literally being devalued, does this mean everybody with a budget will crave anti-cliche imagery? (As opposed to what essentially amounts to cliche stock imagery shot custom?)</p>
<p>I do hope so.</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Hutchinson</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Hutchinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>You probably already know of it but if not check out f/stop, a smaller stock agency with some good creative stuff:
http://www.fstopimages.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You probably already know of it but if not check out f/stop, a smaller stock agency with some good creative stuff:<br />
<a href="http://www.fstopimages.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fstopimages.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce DeBoer</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce DeBoer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-201</guid>
		<description>This is actually quite funny - thanks PE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is actually quite funny &#8211; thanks PE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie Libby</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie Libby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>&quot;If a better photo exists, I’ll buy it.&quot;

Exactly! That&#039;s because the &quot;better photo&quot; has value. 

Figuring out a way to market yourself in these changing times is crucial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If a better photo exists, I’ll buy it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly! That&#8217;s because the &#8220;better photo&#8221; has value. </p>
<p>Figuring out a way to market yourself in these changing times is crucial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odd Thoughts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; new realities for photographers</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Odd Thoughts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; new realities for photographers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-199</guid>
		<description>[...] The Death of $1 Stock [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Death of $1 Stock [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Singer</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately its some of the smaller stock agencies that have some interesting stock that are dying:
http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2007/09/28/ibid-rip/

I don&#039;t know your opinion of IBID, but I always liked a lot of stuff in their collection. (although the name does sound like it would be a micro-stock agency)

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately its some of the smaller stock agencies that have some interesting stock that are dying:<br />
<a href="http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2007/09/28/ibid-rip/" rel="nofollow">http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2007/09/28/ibid-rip/</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know your opinion of IBID, but I always liked a lot of stuff in their collection. (although the name does sound like it would be a micro-stock agency)</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Two Point Oh! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The value of free photography</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Two Point Oh! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The value of free photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ll never be able to argue about the value of free photography for professional (and talented) photographers better than the anonymous photo editor. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ll never be able to argue about the value of free photography for professional (and talented) photographers better than the anonymous photo editor. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aphotoeditor.com/2007/10/01/the-death-of-1-stock/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>took mine off those a few weeks ago. made about $23 in about one year. pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>took mine off those a few weeks ago. made about $23 in about one year. pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

