<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AdAge Magazine Of The Year: The Economist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2008/10/06/adage-magazine-of-the-year-the-economist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2008/10/06/adage-magazine-of-the-year-the-economist/</link>
	<description>Former Photography Director Rob Haggart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:01:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: narayan</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2008/10/06/adage-magazine-of-the-year-the-economist/#comment-29899</link>
		<dc:creator>narayan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=1091#comment-29899</guid>
		<description>the only magazine i&#039;ll subscribe to, and have faithfully since I was 22. absolutely the best. Few magazines will dedicate so much space for in-depth surveys and large stories. Even this current edition, for example, has a 24 page special report on the US election (not to mention the weekly series of different swing states), by issue... with only 2 pages of ads in the entire special. Not even US magazines cover the US election that well. For their longer special reports, it&#039;s obvious they give their writers the time they need to produce the best work... not many publications can boast that. Moreover, it&#039;s never cluttered with so many ads.

Ok, the photography isn&#039;t the best, but they do use photos in a witty way.... and their illustrations are top-shelf. Their quarterly magazine, Intelligent Life, which is wonderfully designed, runs large photo essays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only magazine i&#8217;ll subscribe to, and have faithfully since I was 22. absolutely the best. Few magazines will dedicate so much space for in-depth surveys and large stories. Even this current edition, for example, has a 24 page special report on the US election (not to mention the weekly series of different swing states), by issue&#8230; with only 2 pages of ads in the entire special. Not even US magazines cover the US election that well. For their longer special reports, it&#8217;s obvious they give their writers the time they need to produce the best work&#8230; not many publications can boast that. Moreover, it&#8217;s never cluttered with so many ads.</p>
<p>Ok, the photography isn&#8217;t the best, but they do use photos in a witty way&#8230;. and their illustrations are top-shelf. Their quarterly magazine, Intelligent Life, which is wonderfully designed, runs large photo essays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antryg Revok</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2008/10/06/adage-magazine-of-the-year-the-economist/#comment-29884</link>
		<dc:creator>Antryg Revok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=1091#comment-29884</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the only mag I can think-of, off hand, that holds ABSOLUTELY to Journalism.

Most of the North American periodicals, that I know-of, care more about the sensation they experience from their advertisers, and therefore about the mindless sensation they use to increase short-term sales, than about journalism.

Which is sad, but journalism&#039;s a costly ( in human terms ) practice &amp; commitment, not a get-rich-quick scheme, so there isn&#039;t much &lt;i&gt;money&lt;/i&gt; for honest-to-god versions of it.

I look forward to the day when the pseudo-journalists &amp; pseudo-journalism are labeled correctly as &quot;entertainment&quot;, and the few who care, can proudly be seen to hold to &lt;i&gt;making&lt;/i&gt; just society.

Hmph.  It seems too many of the &quot;journalist-types&quot; I&#039;ve encountered aren&#039;t about fighting, front-line, for human rights &amp; for heart worth.  Instead the one&#039;s I&#039;ve met have almost invariably been about &lt;i&gt;their extra&lt;/i&gt; rights ( private law = privilege ), and their right to rape the rights of others, for their sale/&quot;story&quot;.

I want to meet more of the honest-to-god ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the only mag I can think-of, off hand, that holds ABSOLUTELY to Journalism.</p>
<p>Most of the North American periodicals, that I know-of, care more about the sensation they experience from their advertisers, and therefore about the mindless sensation they use to increase short-term sales, than about journalism.</p>
<p>Which is sad, but journalism&#8217;s a costly ( in human terms ) practice &amp; commitment, not a get-rich-quick scheme, so there isn&#8217;t much <i>money</i> for honest-to-god versions of it.</p>
<p>I look forward to the day when the pseudo-journalists &amp; pseudo-journalism are labeled correctly as &#8220;entertainment&#8221;, and the few who care, can proudly be seen to hold to <i>making</i> just society.</p>
<p>Hmph.  It seems too many of the &#8220;journalist-types&#8221; I&#8217;ve encountered aren&#8217;t about fighting, front-line, for human rights &amp; for heart worth.  Instead the one&#8217;s I&#8217;ve met have almost invariably been about <i>their extra</i> rights ( private law = privilege ), and their right to rape the rights of others, for their sale/&#8221;story&#8221;.</p>
<p>I want to meet more of the honest-to-god ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2008/10/06/adage-magazine-of-the-year-the-economist/#comment-29859</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=1091#comment-29859</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s my favorite magazine to read. The stories are solid, well-researched, clearly written (but not dumbed down) and ahead of the news cycle. They had several articles about tension in South Ossetia weeks before Russia invaded Georgia. And The Economist doesn&#039;t try to be everything to everyone like the other &quot;news&quot; magazines: no pop-stars on the cover, no buying guide for gadgets, no annual articles about the new breakthrough drugs for fill-in-the-blank disease. 

There is a market for people who simply want news and analysis and The Economist capitalizes on it. 

As a photographer, I&#039;d like to see a better use of photos. But you can&#039;t have everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s my favorite magazine to read. The stories are solid, well-researched, clearly written (but not dumbed down) and ahead of the news cycle. They had several articles about tension in South Ossetia weeks before Russia invaded Georgia. And The Economist doesn&#8217;t try to be everything to everyone like the other &#8220;news&#8221; magazines: no pop-stars on the cover, no buying guide for gadgets, no annual articles about the new breakthrough drugs for fill-in-the-blank disease. </p>
<p>There is a market for people who simply want news and analysis and The Economist capitalizes on it. </p>
<p>As a photographer, I&#8217;d like to see a better use of photos. But you can&#8217;t have everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

