Comments on: Wonderwall – Navigate By Photography http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/02/10/wonderwall-navigate-by-photography/ Former Photography Director Rob Haggart Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:09:33 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Sam http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/02/10/wonderwall-navigate-by-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-59811 Sam Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:58:41 +0000 http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=2004#comment-59811 Your web design sux. It is not Search Engine friendly. Pages are slow. Navigation is awful. Have you seen good web design. Go to http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/07/10/35-beautiful-photography-websites/ Your web design sux. It is not Search Engine friendly. Pages are slow. Navigation is awful. Have you seen good web design. Go to
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/07/10/35-beautiful-photography-websites/

]]> By: Fotografi http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/02/10/wonderwall-navigate-by-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-37808 Fotografi Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:17:53 +0000 http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=2004#comment-37808 Really nice, you need a little practice to navigate it. Really nice, you need a little practice to navigate it.

]]> By: A Photo Editor http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/02/10/wonderwall-navigate-by-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-37721 A Photo Editor Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:35:27 +0000 http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=2004#comment-37721 @Giulio Sciorio, Yeah too bad they fired everyone now they can barely get that skinny little magazine out the door. @Giulio Sciorio,
Yeah too bad they fired everyone now they can barely get that skinny little magazine out the door.

]]> By: Becky http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/02/10/wonderwall-navigate-by-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-37711 Becky Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:30:53 +0000 http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=2004#comment-37711 Ted.com has a similar navigation set up for links to their videos. Ted.com has a similar navigation set up for links to their videos.

]]> By: Giulio Sciorio http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/02/10/wonderwall-navigate-by-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-37705 Giulio Sciorio Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:12:17 +0000 http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=2004#comment-37705 Awesome and simple. I wonder what is taking the magazines to get with it. Ahhh they must be doing so much business that its taking up all their time and they'll get to a better web presence once they slow down. Awesome and simple. I wonder what is taking the magazines to get with it. Ahhh they must be doing so much business that its taking up all their time and they’ll get to a better web presence once they slow down.

]]> By: Gordon Moat http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/02/10/wonderwall-navigate-by-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-37704 Gordon Moat Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:32:51 +0000 http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=2004#comment-37704 Tough to get more usable and ergonomic than a printed magazine. When web magazines can repeat some of that user friendliness, then they can be more successful. I am reminded of something I heard from a TBWA/Chiat/Day creative last week: "know your target audience". Quite often we can be creating content for which we are not the target audience. Tough to get more usable and ergonomic than a printed magazine. When web magazines can repeat some of that user friendliness, then they can be more successful. I am reminded of something I heard from a TBWA/Chiat/Day creative last week: “know your target audience”. Quite often we can be creating content for which we are not the target audience.

]]> By: Timothy Schenck http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/02/10/wonderwall-navigate-by-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-37700 Timothy Schenck Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:33:51 +0000 http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=2004#comment-37700 Kind of reminds me of Firefox's Cooliris. I'm finding the ad placement especially annoying. I'll give them a pass on that since it's still in beta. Overall, interesting format, could be a winner. Kudos to them for breaking the status quo. Kind of reminds me of Firefox’s Cooliris. I’m finding the ad placement especially annoying. I’ll give them a pass on that since it’s still in beta. Overall, interesting format, could be a winner. Kudos to them for breaking the status quo.

]]> By: sarah evans http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/02/10/wonderwall-navigate-by-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-37678 sarah evans Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:45:50 +0000 http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=2004#comment-37678 For those who hoard, check out Fast Company March 2007 Table of Contents. Wonderwall is a web version of that print design. Though I'm sure others have similar print examples. Very cool as an interactive. I'll admit to liking a good celebrity story. Only drawback to such a non-standard homepage? I can't pretend I'm reading a serious breaking news story. Critics of industry meltdown say that media continues to lead in tech advances online, but fails on innovation with design and functionality. Majority of newspaper sites have a similar templates. Mag sites distinguish themselves but often don't deliver on personality. Nice if Wonderwall sparks a trend. Fun way to start a work day. Thanks. For those who hoard, check out Fast Company March 2007 Table of Contents. Wonderwall is a web version of that print design. Though I’m sure others have similar print examples. Very cool as an interactive. I’ll admit to liking a good celebrity story. Only drawback to such a non-standard homepage? I can’t pretend I’m reading a serious breaking news story.

Critics of industry meltdown say that media continues to lead in tech advances online, but fails on innovation with design and functionality. Majority of newspaper sites have a similar templates. Mag sites distinguish themselves but often don’t deliver on personality. Nice if Wonderwall sparks a trend.

Fun way to start a work day. Thanks.

]]> By: Rob Greer http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/02/10/wonderwall-navigate-by-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-37677 Rob Greer Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:26:51 +0000 http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=2004#comment-37677 I think the interface is interesting and different, but functionally I found it difficult to navigate laterally. In other words, I could dig into any section but I had to back all the way out to visit another section. If there was another way to easily navigate between sections, it wasn't immediately apparent. I think the interface is interesting and different, but functionally I found it difficult to navigate laterally. In other words, I could dig into any section but I had to back all the way out to visit another section. If there was another way to easily navigate between sections, it wasn’t immediately apparent.

]]>