<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Magazine Isn&#8217;t Dying</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/03/19/the-magazine-isnt-dying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/03/19/the-magazine-isnt-dying/</link>
	<description>Former Photography Director Rob Haggart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:59:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: STONER</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/03/19/the-magazine-isnt-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-40965</link>
		<dc:creator>STONER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=2466#comment-40965</guid>
		<description>With more than 600 new titles launched last year and more than 500 closing up shop, it&#039;s easier than ever to street a new magazine, but the newsstand doesn&#039;t suffer fools lightly.

There are very good reasons Gene Simmons&#039; &quot;Tongue&quot; magazine never lasted – even with Hef&#039;s interest in it. Same goes for the news weeklies and the &quot;me too&quot; lad mags and the weird fashion titles that don&#039;t seem to have any clear direction or purpose past big, juicy images accompanied by little or no copy. 

Now, they all suffered their demise for different reasons, but I&#039;m glad a reputable source is finally saying what some of us have known all along: the magazine isn&#039;t dying at the hands of the web, it&#039;s just &quot;correcting&quot; itself...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With more than 600 new titles launched last year and more than 500 closing up shop, it&#8217;s easier than ever to street a new magazine, but the newsstand doesn&#8217;t suffer fools lightly.</p>
<p>There are very good reasons Gene Simmons&#8217; &#8220;Tongue&#8221; magazine never lasted – even with Hef&#8217;s interest in it. Same goes for the news weeklies and the &#8220;me too&#8221; lad mags and the weird fashion titles that don&#8217;t seem to have any clear direction or purpose past big, juicy images accompanied by little or no copy. </p>
<p>Now, they all suffered their demise for different reasons, but I&#8217;m glad a reputable source is finally saying what some of us have known all along: the magazine isn&#8217;t dying at the hands of the web, it&#8217;s just &#8220;correcting&#8221; itself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
