<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Roundup- Quotes From The Last Couple Weeks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/03/20/friday-roundup-quotes-from-the-last-couple-weeks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/03/20/friday-roundup-quotes-from-the-last-couple-weeks/</link>
	<description>Former Photography Director Rob Haggart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:43:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: scott Rex Ely</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/03/20/friday-roundup-quotes-from-the-last-couple-weeks/comment-page-1/#comment-40475</link>
		<dc:creator>scott Rex Ely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=2474#comment-40475</guid>
		<description>Money paragraph...
&quot;Which doesn&#039;t mean your or my pictures are remotely as interesting, unless we have the same time, dedication and sectionable obsession to photograph the objects of our affection. Yes, we can photograph every kind of egg whisk, or bathtub, we can typologise every aspect of our waking and sleeping lives. We can capture the vernacular of consumption, of fashion, of the human, but ultimately who cares - the plot is too slight. A picture of an egg whisk is still a picture of an egg whisk and nothing more, and most times 100 pictures of egg whisks are just that, 100 pictures of egg whisks. Which is worse than just the one picture. Similarly a picture of a water tower is still a picture of a water tower, and nothing more, and 100 pictures of water towers is just a one way ticket to sleepsville. Unless you&#039;re the Bechers of course.&quot;

Ticket to sleepsville, buy that man a beer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money paragraph&#8230;<br />
&#8220;Which doesn&#8217;t mean your or my pictures are remotely as interesting, unless we have the same time, dedication and sectionable obsession to photograph the objects of our affection. Yes, we can photograph every kind of egg whisk, or bathtub, we can typologise every aspect of our waking and sleeping lives. We can capture the vernacular of consumption, of fashion, of the human, but ultimately who cares &#8211; the plot is too slight. A picture of an egg whisk is still a picture of an egg whisk and nothing more, and most times 100 pictures of egg whisks are just that, 100 pictures of egg whisks. Which is worse than just the one picture. Similarly a picture of a water tower is still a picture of a water tower, and nothing more, and 100 pictures of water towers is just a one way ticket to sleepsville. Unless you&#8217;re the Bechers of course.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ticket to sleepsville, buy that man a beer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
