Comments on: Sports Illustrated’s Slide Show Book

By: The original version looks even better most of the time….. « dreamingArtemis

Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:09:08 +0000

[...] that shows the original slide used for their most iconic magazine cover. You can find the entry here Here you see cover for the issue of SI between December 1987/Jan 1988 where it shows a slam dunk [...]

By: Davin

Davin — Thu, 07 May 2009 15:24:59 +0000

@gogg, Would have wrapped around to the back nicely.

By: Davin

Davin — Thu, 07 May 2009 15:21:27 +0000

@Silver, Correct me if i am wrong, but that shoot is in Walters book Rare Air.

By: Davin

Davin — Thu, 07 May 2009 15:18:37 +0000

Slides, I miss them.

By: Jen

Jen — Fri, 01 May 2009 10:12:51 +0000

That was a trip down memory lane. I used to work at Sports Illustrated’s Picture Collection and handled those slides everyday. It was great fun to meet the photographers who came into the photo library.

By: Totalphotography » Slideshow of the Past

Totalphotography » Slideshow of the Past — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:45:36 +0000

[...] Sports Illustrated is releasing their new book, Slideshow on May 5th ($30). The book is full of slides as they were in their files with all of the original markings and comments with stories of how they came to grace the cover of Sports Illustrated. For those who have only ever used digital equipment it will give you a better appreciation of how the pros do it and the extra effort that went into wading through slides to find the one shot. For a teaser of what is in store for you with this new book see A Photo Editor’s write up. [...]

By: Jen

Jen — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:14:23 +0000

That was a trip down memory lane. I used to work in the Sports Illustrated Picture Library and handled those slides on a daily basis. It was a great experience.

By: gogg

gogg — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:49:39 +0000

I am so glad to see that its not only me that crop, a lot of people says ” i never crop” and pretend they are ……But what count is good picture in the end and those shown here are indeed. Agree on Jordan images, better uncropped , but as a huge fine art print….

By: brian faini

brian faini — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:16:01 +0000

Looking at the full frame image of those shots make me despise the editing process and the cropping that occurs even more than I once did.

Given sports shots don’t always have a wonderful composition due to there snapshot nature. I still think those selected are beautiful.

By: Kent Johnson

Kent Johnson — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:53:53 +0000

Looks like the shots were better before they were cropped for the covers.

Thats life eh!

Nice to see such great shots shown full frame.

By: Tom

Tom — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:25:34 +0000

@Tom, I meant still shot film in the newspaper world.

By: Tom

Tom — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:24:28 +0000

I am a child of the digital age, but I worked professionally in the newspaper world when we still used digital. Heck I did prepress work with a process camera and halftone screens!!

I can not wait to see this book. I love to see and learn how these great images are made. I agree the photos that were done in the past seem to hold up more, and have a certain something that current ctures and current processes isn’t capturing. The historian/acrhivist in me loves and leans towards film. In 50 years, what will people do… pull out a cd/dvd from current times, and say “we took the original pictures off of this CD that may or may not have been used to make the originals…”- who knows if the computers then will be able to READ those cds… A slide or negative, it is still there.

I LOVE knowing that each negative, or slide was THERE at that moment. That exact photographer loaded that exact roll or sheet of film into their camera at that EVENT and took that picture. That does something for me. I love picking out old negatives I shot and know that they were there in the camera in front of my face at that moment in time.

Anyway, can’t wait to see the book!

By: Michael T Regan

Michael T Regan — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:36:01 +0000

Agreed. Jordan’s shadow in the horizontal slide is wonderful. I love the highlight detail in his shoes and socks. Even if its a marketing move to cash in on the archives, I’m looking forward to seeing them all together in one book.

By: Dave Prelosky

Dave Prelosky — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:49:51 +0000

@ericF., In 1982 there were plenty of quality photo scanners – just not consumer units. Ask anyone who has worked in the printing trade about a Crossfield for more info. Really Old School was making prints to shoot separations, but by the 80′s high quality scanners were The Way to Go

By: doug

doug — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:50:29 +0000

That’s cool stuff reminds me of the avedon madein France book with his prints with all the notes and matboard showing.

By: bryansoderlind

bryansoderlind — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:03:46 +0000

That shot of Jordan is amazing, I agree with Silver that the uncropped version is so much more remarkable. If that photo was taken today on blue someone would’ve dropped in a stupid plate.

By: Silver

Silver — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:43:51 +0000

That uncropped shot of Jordan is so much better than the cover shot.

I may have to pick this up, it looks very interesting.

By: Max

Max — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:58:49 +0000

Really great book

By: Kenneth Jarecke

Kenneth Jarecke — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:42:12 +0000

Good stuff made under a high level of difficulty.

I can’t figure out why the images, although not as technically good as what can be done today, seem to be more “vital”, or less disposable then what we’re doing now.

I wonder if the forty year rule, the time it takes for a good picture to become “classic” will hold true for the images made today.

By: Tyler, Chicago

Tyler, Chicago — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:05:39 +0000

Love that first cover shot. No auto focus. No auto white balance. No 10-frames-per-second motor drive. No LCD review screen. No second chances. No mistakes.

By: Andrew Killian

Andrew Killian — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:41:05 +0000

Great book for the OG sports photographers. Going to get a copy asap!

By: Sharon P. Fibelkorn

Sharon P. Fibelkorn — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:10:41 +0000

Wow! That’s way cool. I’ve always admired that SI Editors for their vision as opposed to other editors who are afraid to pull out pieces of a shot for a cover. There is a thin line between the front of the pack leading and the rest of the pack following (or trying to). I see a new book to be added to my collection.

By: STONER

STONER — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:28:33 +0000

Dang, I really do miss film, from an PE/AD/EIC point of view. And I was still working with hand-built mechanicals up through ’93, so it just wasn’t too long ago that the glory days of film were still rolling.

The tactile experience of editing film and everything that goes along with it is something that just doesn’t have anything to do, generally, with the business anymore. I think PEs, ADs and designers who don’t get any years under their belts with the crafts of film, hand-built mechanicals, setting type, etc. are really missing an important part of the artform of print and they’ll never really understand why. Too bad, really…

By: robert wright

robert wright — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:10:40 +0000

well ya gotta get some mileage out of them old slides since they are only worth 7 dollars each right?

By: bobscott

bobscott — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:42:03 +0000

What a cool idea for SI. One the few magazines that has enough slide content to really make this kind of book happen. I use to bring some of those rolls of slides to the SI film lab back in the day for Walter Iooss. I still love Velvia.

By: ericF.

ericF. — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:39:58 +0000

“They must have had some kick ass film scanners at SI because I remember it being so difficult to get a decent cover that way”

It was 1982. they made a print and went to press “old-school”

By: Steven Rood

Steven Rood — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:38:02 +0000

Awesome.

By: Sports Illustrated’s Slide Show Book | The Click

Sports Illustrated’s Slide Show Book | The Click — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:31:55 +0000

[...] Check it out here. [...]