Untitled – The Movie

This movie looks funny as hell. “What attracts me to his work is how uncomfortable it makes me feel.”

Comments 13

  1. ct wrote:

    “…not another ‘But is it Art?’ discussion…”
    Beauty.

    [Reply]

    Posted 02 Oct 2009 at 9:25 am
  2. Herve d'Aspheries wrote:

    SImply hilarious! Hope it’s gonna be shown on this side of the Atlantic!

    [Reply]

    Posted 02 Oct 2009 at 11:15 am
  3. michael wrote:

    I saw this and I thought it was incredibly entertaining and very funny. The absurdity of the art world is a bit of an easy target but the writers did an excellent job of clearly pointing out the hypocrisy of the gallery system. Adam goldberg is perfect as the tortured artist and Marley Shelton is amazing and beautiful!

    [Reply]

    Posted 02 Oct 2009 at 11:27 am
  4. Alex Gauthier wrote:

    Wow! So, seeing this. Dragging all my old art school friends with me too.

    [Reply]

    Posted 02 Oct 2009 at 11:39 am
  5. rob g wrote:

    yes, well the movie may be good…. but is it art?

    [Reply]

    Posted 02 Oct 2009 at 12:41 pm
  6. Roark wrote:

    Is that Alec Soth?

    [Reply]

    Posted 02 Oct 2009 at 1:44 pm
  7. shahnyboy wrote:

    So killing himself is more artistic then “getting a job” to that guy?… hahah

    Ironic that these kinds of “artists” who want to tell/show a higher truth come off as the most narcissist & self-centered and almost stupid.

    [Reply]

    Chuck Shakokis Reply:

    @shahnyboy,
    It’s a movie

    [Reply]

    shahnyboy Reply:

    @Chuck Shakokis,
    Good point chuck, cos characters in movies are always fictional and never relate to people in the real world.

    [Reply]

    Chuck Shakokis Reply:

    @shahnyboy,
    correct, they’re fictional & in the case of this film, quite two dimensional characters representing a narrow range of dull cliches about contemporary art. Still, the blonde looks hot.

    [Reply]

    Posted 02 Oct 2009 at 2:45 pm
  8. jimmy wrote:

    I thought the 80’s thing was in the rear view.

    [Reply]

    Posted 03 Oct 2009 at 12:23 pm
  9. stephen gelb wrote:

    classic. i especially liked the image of the monkey putting the vaccum cleaner to its face.

    [Reply]

    Posted 03 Oct 2009 at 6:21 pm
  10. Rob Greer wrote:

    I wonder if this film will be appreciated by folks who aren’t artists, art lovers, or critics. In other words, the audience for this film may be very narrow.

    As for me, I can’t wait to see it … via Netflix.

    [Reply]

    Brooks Reply:

    @Rob Greer, I think everyone knows at least a few people who thought they could make a “Jackson Pollock” themselves after seeing that movie. :-)

    [Reply]

    Posted 04 Oct 2009 at 11:54 am
  11. Brett Beyer wrote:

    This looks like it could be amazing.

    [Reply]

    Posted 04 Oct 2009 at 3:59 pm
  12. jesse wrote:

    skinny legs and all

    [Reply]

    Posted 05 Oct 2009 at 10:31 pm
  13. J0hn Martin wrote:

    My friend worked on this so I went to a preview showing in SF. This is one of the funniest movies I have seen in a long time. You will never think of the art world the same again. You have to see this. It is just brutal exposing the New York art scene.

    [Reply]

    Posted 06 Oct 2009 at 7:04 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *