<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photography Agent Blogs Evolve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/</link>
	<description>Former Photography Director Rob Haggart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:55:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jasmine DeFoore</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-55559</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasmine DeFoore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=4549#comment-55559</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention Rob.  We have recently completely redesigned our website and our featuring our blog content more prominently. We&#039;re also posting more photographer Q&amp;As and other non-tear sheet items.  It&#039;s fun to do and definitely helps bring traffic to our site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention Rob.  We have recently completely redesigned our website and our featuring our blog content more prominently. We&#8217;re also posting more photographer Q&amp;As and other non-tear sheet items.  It&#8217;s fun to do and definitely helps bring traffic to our site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce DeBoer</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-55385</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce DeBoer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=4549#comment-55385</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not enough to post on blogs - in my opinion - check out why I think CP+B are ahead of the curve and should be forgiven for having a Twitter feed on their Site:

http://www.justin.tv/fearlessqa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not enough to post on blogs &#8211; in my opinion &#8211; check out why I think CP+B are ahead of the curve and should be forgiven for having a Twitter feed on their Site:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.justin.tv/fearlessqa" rel="nofollow">http://www.justin.tv/fearlessqa</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Roemer</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-55290</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Roemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=4549#comment-55290</guid>
		<description>@Bruce DeBoer, 12/1/09.  Let it be known that on this date, at this time, publishing a Twitter feed on a web site has officially become dated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bruce DeBoer, 12/1/09.  Let it be known that on this date, at this time, publishing a Twitter feed on a web site has officially become dated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce DeBoer</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-55284</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce DeBoer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=4549#comment-55284</guid>
		<description>@Jon Roemer, You might be right.  It&#039;ll be interesting to see how long they keep this going. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if having a Twitter feed on your website becomes dated very quickly.  Do you have any predictions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jon Roemer, You might be right.  It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how long they keep this going. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if having a Twitter feed on your website becomes dated very quickly.  Do you have any predictions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Roemer</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-55283</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Roemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=4549#comment-55283</guid>
		<description>@Bruce DeBoer, 
I&#039;ve seen the BooneOakley video.  I think it&#039;s great.  It&#039;s fun; both the content and the medium work together to send a message.  It also has signposts for potential BO clients.

I don&#039;t see that in the CP+B site.  To me the CP+B site dumps a lot of stuff on the table, including unneeded things like the twitter feed, and it walks away leaving the viewer to make sense of it all.

I don&#039;t see the CP+B site fulfilling &quot;b&quot; because it&#039;s breaking a few cardinal rules of websites - c) don&#039;t leave the viewer confused, d) make sure you get your message across quickly, and e) make your navigation obvious and clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bruce DeBoer,<br />
I&#8217;ve seen the BooneOakley video.  I think it&#8217;s great.  It&#8217;s fun; both the content and the medium work together to send a message.  It also has signposts for potential BO clients.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see that in the CP+B site.  To me the CP+B site dumps a lot of stuff on the table, including unneeded things like the twitter feed, and it walks away leaving the viewer to make sense of it all.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see the CP+B site fulfilling &#8220;b&#8221; because it&#8217;s breaking a few cardinal rules of websites &#8211; c) don&#8217;t leave the viewer confused, d) make sure you get your message across quickly, and e) make your navigation obvious and clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce DeBoer</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-55272</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce DeBoer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=4549#comment-55272</guid>
		<description>@Jon Roemer, I think it&#039;s more than being &quot;in the mix&quot;.  The site shows work but other than that the best a website can do is to a) give the visitor a feeling for the agency culture and b) give them a reason to return.

Personally I think it&#039;s pretty brave and reflects their culture well.  Another good example is from BooneOakley: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Elo7WeIydh8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jon Roemer, I think it&#8217;s more than being &#8220;in the mix&#8221;.  The site shows work but other than that the best a website can do is to a) give the visitor a feeling for the agency culture and b) give them a reason to return.</p>
<p>Personally I think it&#8217;s pretty brave and reflects their culture well.  Another good example is from BooneOakley: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Elo7WeIydh8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Elo7WeIydh8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacqueline Bovaird</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-55182</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacqueline Bovaird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=4549#comment-55182</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rob!!! I&#039;m glad to hear people are enjoying the Q&amp;As!! They took a break in November and will be back up and running this month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rob!!! I&#8217;m glad to hear people are enjoying the Q&amp;As!! They took a break in November and will be back up and running this month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discoteche napoli</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-55150</link>
		<dc:creator>discoteche napoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=4549#comment-55150</guid>
		<description>good look .i like this site,thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good look .i like this site,thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce DeBoer</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-55115</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce DeBoer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=4549#comment-55115</guid>
		<description>Putting their money where their creativity is, the CPB site is open source.  They&#039;ve made the source code available to developers.  

Go Here: http://github.com/cpbadmin/newd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putting their money where their creativity is, the CPB site is open source.  They&#8217;ve made the source code available to developers.  </p>
<p>Go Here: <a href="http://github.com/cpbadmin/newd" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/cpbadmin/newd</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Roemer</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-55106</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Roemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=4549#comment-55106</guid>
		<description>For the most part these are all quite nice and the idea meshes with what a designer told me recently.  She sees a lot of web design going to blog based formats.

That said - I find the CP+B site a turn-off.  To me it&#039;s too busy  and indiscriminate.  A Twitter feed front and center.  Why?  It&#039;s lots of one sided comments that no one can ever really follow.  I don&#039;t get it.   

I know that CP+B is trying to send the message that &quot;we&#039;re in the mix,&quot; but I wonder if this type of presentation can backfire from a client&#039;s perspective.  In other words, for the ad agency&#039;s client, the ad agency is supposed to cut through the noise and the clutter of the media world to get a client&#039;s product noticed.  But CP+B&#039;s site seems to send the message - we don&#039;t cut through the clutter, we&#039;re a part of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part these are all quite nice and the idea meshes with what a designer told me recently.  She sees a lot of web design going to blog based formats.</p>
<p>That said &#8211; I find the CP+B site a turn-off.  To me it&#8217;s too busy  and indiscriminate.  A Twitter feed front and center.  Why?  It&#8217;s lots of one sided comments that no one can ever really follow.  I don&#8217;t get it.   </p>
<p>I know that CP+B is trying to send the message that &#8220;we&#8217;re in the mix,&#8221; but I wonder if this type of presentation can backfire from a client&#8217;s perspective.  In other words, for the ad agency&#8217;s client, the ad agency is supposed to cut through the noise and the clutter of the media world to get a client&#8217;s product noticed.  But CP+B&#8217;s site seems to send the message &#8211; we don&#8217;t cut through the clutter, we&#8217;re a part of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-55102</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=4549#comment-55102</guid>
		<description>Jed Root is my favorite. But I am totally biased on that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jed Root is my favorite. But I am totally biased on that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-55100</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=4549#comment-55100</guid>
		<description>speaking of cp+b, this reminds me of some other brands/agencies that have done some clever integrations with social media tools: skittles and advertising agency boone oakley.

skittles i believe was one of the first to do what cp+b did - bring in feeds from flickr, twitter, facebook, wikipedia...

boone oakley was very clever in the way they leveraged youtube to create their agency website. love their cheeky &amp; irreverent tone of voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speaking of cp+b, this reminds me of some other brands/agencies that have done some clever integrations with social media tools: skittles and advertising agency boone oakley.</p>
<p>skittles i believe was one of the first to do what cp+b did &#8211; bring in feeds from flickr, twitter, facebook, wikipedia&#8230;</p>
<p>boone oakley was very clever in the way they leveraged youtube to create their agency website. love their cheeky &amp; irreverent tone of voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Avedon</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-55098</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Avedon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=4549#comment-55098</guid>
		<description>Adding JedRoot: http://blog.jedroot.com/jri/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding JedRoot: <a href="http://blog.jedroot.com/jri/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.jedroot.com/jri/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-55095</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=4549#comment-55095</guid>
		<description>Bernstein and Andrulli&#039;s website is extremely nice. One can really appreciate the thought, design and customization behind it.  Mullen Advertising: mullen.com also changed their website to a blog format one. We enjoy your blog very much too Rob and Kristina.

Happy Thanksgiving!

Christine Kelly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernstein and Andrulli&#8217;s website is extremely nice. One can really appreciate the thought, design and customization behind it.  Mullen Advertising: mullen.com also changed their website to a blog format one. We enjoy your blog very much too Rob and Kristina.</p>
<p>Happy Thanksgiving!</p>
<p>Christine Kelly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina Feliciano</title>
		<link>http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/11/25/photography-agent-blogs-evolve/comment-page-1/#comment-55093</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina Feliciano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aphotoeditor.com/?p=4549#comment-55093</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for including the Stockland Martel blog in your post, Rob. Blogs, whether they&#039;re photographer blogs or photography-agent blogs, can—and, I would argue, should—be so much more than alternate portfolios. Not only are they a much more nimble marketing platform than a website; they&#039;re also just intrinsically more informal and conversational, and therefore compelling in a different way. Plus, they&#039;re totally fun to write.

Happy Thanksgiving to you!

Kristina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for including the Stockland Martel blog in your post, Rob. Blogs, whether they&#8217;re photographer blogs or photography-agent blogs, can—and, I would argue, should—be so much more than alternate portfolios. Not only are they a much more nimble marketing platform than a website; they&#8217;re also just intrinsically more informal and conversational, and therefore compelling in a different way. Plus, they&#8217;re totally fun to write.</p>
<p>Happy Thanksgiving to you!</p>
<p>Kristina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
