“On each occasion, I was politely told that the typical buyer of advertising space lacked the time and intelligence to grasp complicated ideas such as I had just presented. Nor in six years was any notable investment made in a dedicated sales staff, reader research or web development for I.D.”
“Imagine going to a hospital and learning from the person holding the scalpel that he really doesn’t see a difference between your hand and your foot; after all, an appendage is an appendage, and a sock can be pulled over any of them.”
Read more (here) via, Magtastic Blogsplosion
Comments 2
wow… that’s depressing.
a truly great mag.
rocksteady,
danno~
[Reply]
Posted 20 Jan 2010 at 2:03 pm ¶When Critique magazine disappeared many years ago, I found myself getting more into I.D. Unfortunately the content, commentary, and writing seems to have diminished over the last few years, and I rarely bought one. As creative professions have seemingly declined over the last decade, many magazines for that audience have followed.
[Reply]
Posted 20 Jan 2010 at 2:17 pm ¶Trackbacks & Pingbacks 2
[...] (via A Photo Editor) [...]
[...] try to follow this: I was reading A Photo Editor’s recent “I.D.’s Executioners” post, which linked to a post by Julie Lasky on The Design Observatory’s site, which [...]
Post a Comment